nanog mailing list archives

Re: 600 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses


From: "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 14 Aug 2010 12:22:00 -0400

Convincingly said here on an ISP mailing list. But what about the
folks who were denied address assignments by ARIN policies over the
last 15 years? Denied them based on the fiction that ISPs didn't own
IP addresses, that they were merely holding the addresses in trust for
the public they serve. ...

I dunno. What was New York's responsibility in the 1790s to guys who didn't join the army because they had to stay home and take care of their widowed mother and six younger sisters?

I wouldn't for a moment claim that IPv4 space was a way that was uniformly fair or wise or close to ideal. But I don't think you're going to have much luck imposing fairness and wisdom retroactively on people who've already got the space.

R's,
John


Current thread: