nanog mailing list archives
40 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses
From: Jimi Thompson <jimi.thompson () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:27:14 -0500
It was 40 acres and a mule - FYI On 8/14/10 11:22 AM, "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com> wrote:
Convincingly said here on an ISP mailing list. But what about the folks who were denied address assignments by ARIN policies over the last 15 years? Denied them based on the fiction that ISPs didn't own IP addresses, that they were merely holding the addresses in trust for the public they serve. ...I dunno. What was New York's responsibility in the 1790s to guys who didn't join the army because they had to stay home and take care of their widowed mother and six younger sisters? I wouldn't for a moment claim that IPv4 space was a way that was uniformly fair or wise or close to ideal. But I don't think you're going to have much luck imposing fairness and wisdom retroactively on people who've already got the space. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Joe Maimon (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Nick Hilliard (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Mark Andrews (Aug 16)
- Re: 600 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses John Levine (Aug 13)
- Re: 600 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: 600 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses John R. Levine (Aug 14)
- Re: 600 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses William Herrin (Aug 14)
- 40 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses Jimi Thompson (Aug 14)
- Re: 40 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses Scott Brim (Aug 14)
- Re: 40 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses Joel Jaeggli (Aug 14)
- Re: 40 acres and a mule, was Lightly used IP addresses Andrew Kirch (Aug 14)