nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?


From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick () zill net>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:29:02 -0400

Benjamin Billon wrote:

So basically, the idea is to disconnect China's Internet even more
than what it inflicts to itself?
And that is wrong why exactly? ;-)
Nah, I'm not answering that =D
Nice try, though.
How fun. What was the FCC/Comcast case about again?
It's only port 25, at least here:
http://www.okean.com/antispam/iptables/iptables.html
This is also blocking Sina, Netease, Yahoo.cn and other major Chinese
ISP/ESP. Am I the only to think this is not very smart?

If you think Chinese DUL would be interesting, please tell me.



This DID actually bite my company about 3 years ago.

A customer went to China (usually in NYC) and could not send email
through the mail server because they were using POP-before-SMTP instead
of the mail submission port .

Upon return, the customer switched mail service away from us.

--Patrick


Current thread: