nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?


From: Larry Smith <lesmith () ecsis net>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:09:54 -0500

+1

On Thu April 8 2010 20:50, Aaron Wendel wrote:
Please.

-----Original Message-----
From: Will Clayton [mailto:w.d.clayton () gmail com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:43 PM
To: Beavis
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?

Do share!

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Beavis <pfunix () gmail com> wrote:
Is it possible for you to share that filter list you have for china?
im getting bogged down by those ssh-bruts as well coming in from
china.


-B

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
On 4/8/10 2:23 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
We just got Cyclops alerts showing several of our prefixes sourced
from AS23474 propagating through AS4134.  Anyone else?

aut-num:      AS23724
as-name:      CHINANET-IDC-BJ-AP
descr:        IDC, China Telecommunications Corporation
country:      CN

aut-num:      AS4134
as-name:      CHINANET-BACKBONE
descr:        No.31,Jin-rong Street
descr:        Beijing
descr:        100032
country:      CN

--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay () impulse net
Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV

I'm starting to wonder if someone is 'testing the waters' in China to

see

what they can get away with. I hate to be like this, but there's a

reason

why I have all of China filtered on my routers.

Amazing how much  SSH hammering, spam, and other nastiness went away
within minutes of the filtering going in place.
There comes a point where 'accidental' and 'isolated incident' become
"we no
care" and "spam not illegal".  And no, i'm not quoting that to mock,
but rather repeat exactly what admins in China send to me in response
to abuse reports and blocking in the AHBL.




Current thread: