nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
From: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg () ripe net>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 09:02:14 +0200
:-) ;-) ;-) And now for the political analysis in our morning programming broadcasted to North America: Beware of unintentionally helping the Chinese government to implement the Great Firewall by blocking packet flow right there in the land of Free Speech(TM). The satisfaction of vigorously loosing shots will qiuckly dissipate as soon as the bullets start impacting feet very nearby. Now let us return to our regular mix of operationally tinted programming. :-) ;-) ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?, (continued)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Benjamin Billon (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Burwell (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Patrick Giagnocavo (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Rich Kulawiec (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Warren Bailey (Apr 09)
- RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Jim Templin (Apr 09)
- Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)