nanog mailing list archives
Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8)
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 08:12:27 -0700
In a message written on Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 10:12:48AM -0400, Brandon Ross wrote:
The suggestion was to run a "v6 only network". Does anyone on the NANOG list believe that v6 is at all ready to be run without any v4 underpinnings and provide a real service to a customer base?
Is it ready, absolutely. Is it pretty, not quite. But that's ok, it will take some time in the real world to get the spit polish IPv4 has had 25+ years to earn. The issue is not is IPv6 ready, it's how do you interoperate between the IPv6 world and the IPv4 world. Dual stack was/is the answer, but with IPv4 running out it won't be for much longer. Is the answer a transition mechanism or cold turkey? It probably depends on your situation. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8), (continued)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 06)
- RE: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks) (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Robert E. Seastrom (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 06)
- Re: interop show network Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Eliot Lear (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Brandon Ross (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) bmanning (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Mark Smith (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network sthaug (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Justin M. Streiner (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: interop show network (was: legacy /8) Kevin Oberman (Apr 11)