nanog mailing list archives

Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?


From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:02:00 +0100

On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't
planning on success.

You mean, like multisession bgp over tls?

Nick,
just sayin'


Current thread: