nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:38:29 +0700
On Oct 28, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
I'm wondering what are the growing trends in connecting Data Centers for redundancy in DR/COOP environments.
'DR' is an obsolete 40-year-old mainframe concept; it never works, as funding/testing/scaling of the 'backup' systems is never adequate and/ or allowed.
Layer-2 between sites is evil, as well.Layer-3-independence and active/active/etc. is where it's at in terms of high availability in the 21st Century. GSLB, et. al.
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical insights. -- xkcd #625
Current thread:
- Redundant Data Center Architectures Stefan Fouant (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures ChrisSerafin (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Roland Dobbins (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Charles Wyble (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Ray Sanders (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Roland Dobbins (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Brandon Galbraith (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Darren Bolding (Oct 28)
- RE: Redundant Data Center Architectures Stefan Fouant (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Truman Boyes (Oct 28)
- Re: Redundant Data Center Architectures Roland Dobbins (Oct 28)