nanog mailing list archives

Re: Minimum IPv6 size

From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:08:55 -0700

Owen DeLong wrote:

Given that ARIN issues /48s to multihomed end users, I think it would
be wise to accept them.


True, although 2620:0::/23 is still a black hole for some. When did ARIN
start using it, 2007?

~Seth

Current thread:

Minimum IPv6 size Seth Mattinen (Oct 02)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 02)
  - Re: Minimum IPv6 size James Aldridge (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size James Aldridge (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Bicknell (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Christian Seitz (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Owen DeLong (Oct 02)
  - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Seth Mattinen (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Brandon Butterworth (Oct 03)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Brandon Butterworth (Oct 03)
  - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Matthew Petach (Oct 03)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 04)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Kevin Oberman (Oct 04)
    - Re: Minimum IPv6 size Leo Vegoda (Oct 05)
- Re: Minimum IPv6 size Brandon Butterworth (Oct 04)