nanog mailing list archives
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
From: Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz () bromirski net>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:45:48 +0100
On 2009-11-12 22:37, David Coulson wrote:
The MX-series are pretty nice. That should be able to do VPLS PE, however I've never tried it - MX240 did it pretty well last time I tried. I've no clue how the cost of that switch compares to a cisco 4900 or something (not that a 4900 is anything special - L3 is all in software).
For both 4948/4948-10GE and 4900M L3 is in hardware. For 4948/4948-10GE IPv6 is in software, for 4900M it's in hardware. -- "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski If it's not okay, it's not the end. | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
Current thread:
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR, (continued)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Brandon Ewing (Nov 12)
- RE: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Bulger, Tim (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Brandon Galbraith (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Nick Hilliard (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Kinkie (Nov 18)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 18)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Chuck Anderson (Nov 18)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR David Coulson (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Jonathan Lassoff (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR David Coulson (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Łukasz Bromirski (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Olof Kasselstrand (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Malte von dem Hagen (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Tore Anderson (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR gordon b slater (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Simon Leinen (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Matthew Walster (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Stefan (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR rodrick brown (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Joe Loiacono (Nov 13)