RE: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR

["Bulger, Tim" <Tim_Bulger () polk com>]

If you use stackable switches, you can stack across cabinets (up to 3 with 1 meter Cisco 3750 Stackwise), and uplink on 
the ends.  It's a pretty solid layout if you plan your port needs properly based on NIC density and cabinet size, plus 
you can cable cleanly to an adjacent cabinet's switch if necessary.

Slightly off-topic.. Consider offloading 100Mb connections like PDUs, DRAC/iLO, etc. to lower cost switches to get the 
most out of your premium ports.

-Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm () rollernet us] 
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 3:20 PM
To: 'nanog () nanog org'
Subject: Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR

Steve Feldman wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Raj Singh wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> >
> > I am wondering how many of you are doing layer 3 to top of rack
> > switches and what the pros and cons are. Also, if you are doing layer
> > 3 to top of  rack do you guys have any links to published white papers
> > on it?
>
> Dani Roisman gave an excellent talk on this subject at NANOG 46 in
> Philadelpha:
>
>  
> http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog46/abstracts.php?pt=MTQwOCZuYW5vZzQ2&nm=nanog46


I'd always wondered how you make a subnet available across racks with L3
rack switching. It seems that you don't.

~Seth