nanog mailing list archives
Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:29:17 -0500
From a colleague here at NASA (high-performance computing area):
"We are currently using our three Arista switches as an extremely economical way to get a 10G non-blocking testbed for our various test areas. We have every intention of looking at them as an option for their routing capabilities, but have been buried with setup and testing of our testbed equipment and getting ready for Super Computing 2009. They seem to have a number of very promising possibilities and have so far proven to be very capable switches. Paul Lang" Joe From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> To: Matthew Walster <matthew () walster org> Cc: nanog list <nanog () nanog org> Date: 11/13/2009 08:34 AM Subject: Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR i have seen no mention of arista as a tos switch/router, yet folk tell me it is one of the hottest on the block today. is there anyone who is actuallly using it who would care to report? randy
Current thread:
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR, (continued)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Ćukasz Bromirski (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Olof Kasselstrand (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Malte von dem Hagen (Nov 12)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Tore Anderson (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR gordon b slater (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Simon Leinen (Nov 15)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Matthew Walster (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Randy Bush (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Stefan (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR rodrick brown (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Joe Loiacono (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Cord MacLeod (Nov 13)
- Re: Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR Shane Ronan (Nov 13)