nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:20:04 -0400
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: [snip]
Are there any potential dangers of publishing our information before we use it that I may be overlooking?
In case you are worried about folks who filter, recall that the IRR uniqueeness is based upon the Prefix/length, originAS, and sourceDB tuple. There is nothing wrong with registering the origin as it is parallel to the origin-as-it-will be. If *you* do it, instead of your provider, you will not have to co-ordinate with anyone to yank the old one. Purposeful overlapping for the purposes of transition is one of the features. Cheers, Joe -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Pro-actively publishing IRR data Steve Bertrand (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Joe Provo (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Steve Bertrand (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Joe Provo (Mar 16)