nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data
From: Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:06:54 -0400
Joe Provo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote: [snip]Are there any potential dangers of publishing our information before we use it that I may be overlooking?In case you are worried about folks who filter, recall that the IRR uniqueeness is based upon the Prefix/length, originAS, and sourceDB tuple. There is nothing wrong with registering the origin as it is parallel to the origin-as-it-will be. If *you* do it, instead of your provider, you will not have to co-ordinate with anyone to yank the old one. Purposeful overlapping for the purposes of transition is one of the features.
Thanks Joe, This is exactly what I was looking to find out. Cheers, Steve
Current thread:
- Pro-actively publishing IRR data Steve Bertrand (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Joe Provo (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Steve Bertrand (Mar 16)
- Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data Joe Provo (Mar 16)