nanog mailing list archives

Re: Pro-actively publishing IRR data


From: Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:06:54 -0400

Joe Provo wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
[snip]
Are there any potential dangers of publishing our information before we
use it that I may be overlooking?
 
In case you are worried about folks who filter, recall that the IRR
uniqueeness is based upon the Prefix/length, originAS, and sourceDB 
tuple.  There is nothing wrong with registering the origin as it is
parallel to the origin-as-it-will be.  If *you* do it, instead of 
your provider, you will not have to co-ordinate with anyone to yank
the old one.  Purposeful overlapping for the purposes of transition
is one of the features.

Thanks Joe,

This is exactly what I was looking to find out.

Cheers,

Steve


Current thread: