nanog mailing list archives

Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:31:03 -0400

On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:53:01 -0800, Marcus Reid said:

A quick scan of the reverse mapping for your address space in DNS reveals
that you have basically your entire network on public addresses.  No wonder
you're worried about portscans when the printer down the hall and the
receptionists machine are sitting on public addresses.  I think you are
trying to secure your network from the wrong end here.

You *do* realize that "has a public address" does not actually mean that
the machine is reachable from random addresses, right?  There *are* these
nice utilities called iptables and ipf - even Windows and Macs can be configured
to say "bugger off" to unwanted traffic.  And you can put a firewall appliance
inline without using NAT as well.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: