nanog mailing list archives
RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: "Skeeve Stevens" <skeeve () skeeve org>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:19:58 +1100
See my other email. You don't need to use a providers range. ...Skeeve -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Huff [mailto:mhuff () ox com] Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2009 8:35 AM To: 'Måns Nilsson'; 'Zaid Ali'; 'Roger Marquis' Cc: 'nanog () nanog org' Subject: RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space DNS is great, but there is plenty of stuff to change that doesn't use DNS (ACLS, etc...). The point is, why should we go through the pain of renumbering, and have to do it everytime our relationship with our ISP changes? We aren't going to go there. It isn't renumbering that's the problem, the problem is that it being tied to an external company. ---- Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd OTA Management LLC | Purchase, NY 10577 http://www.ox.com | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-460-4139
-----Original Message----- From: Måns Nilsson [mailto:mansaxel () besserwisser org] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:19 PM To: Matthew Huff; 'Zaid Ali'; 'Roger Marquis' Cc: 'nanog () nanog org' Subject: RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space --On tisdag, tisdag 3 feb 2009 13.24.59 -0500 Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:It's not just technical. Companies are reluctant to migrate to an IP address owned by an ISP. We are one of those companies. If and whenitis easy for us to apply and receive our own Ipv6 address space, wewilllook at deploying ipv6, but not until then. That's not a technical issue, but rather a business decision, and it's not going to change.Wearen't depending our network resources on an external third-party, especially given their track record.Renumbering will happen. Be prepared or cry louder when it happens. DNS was invented for this, and v4 PA space is functionally equivalent to v6 here. Getting PI space only pushes the inevitable a bit, while lessening the incentives to DTRT wrt IP address mobility. -- Måns Nilsson M A C H I N A YOW!!! I am having fun!!!
Current thread:
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space, (continued)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Trey Darley (Feb 10)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Roger Marquis (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Zaid Ali (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Timmins (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Zaid Ali (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Måns Nilsson (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Paul Timmins (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Heather Schiller (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Jeroen Massar (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Nathan Ward (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Peter J. Cherny (Feb 03)
- RE: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Skeeve Stevens (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Mark Andrews (Feb 03)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Joel Jaeggli (Feb 08)
- Re: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space Bill Stewart (Feb 09)