Re: IPv6 Confusion

[Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith () gmail com>]

On 2/17/09, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
> > I find it a shame that NAT-PT has become depreciated
>
> the ietf has recanted and is hurriedly trying to get this back on
> track.  of course, to save face, the name has to be changed.
>
> > with people talking about carrier grade NATS I think combining
> > these with NAT-PT could help with the transition
>
> cgn is not a transition tool.  it is a dangerous hack to deal with
> the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
> space to number their customer edge.
>
> randy
Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out dual
stacks to the CPE.

-brandon

-- 
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbraith () gmail com