nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 Confusion


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:45:33 +0900

    cgn is not a transition tool.  it is a dangerous hack to deal with
    the problems of a few very large consumer isps who lack sufficient
    space to number their customer edge.
Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out
dual stacks to the CPE.

except that, if you do not have enough ipv4 pace to number your cpe
perimeter, you can't do that.

again, take a look at draft-ymbk-aplusp-02.txt

randy


Current thread: