Re: 97.128.0.0/9 allocation to verizon wireless

[Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>]

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:31:38PM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Mark Andrews schrieb:
> >     I don't see any reason to complain based on those numbers.
> >     It's just a extremely high growth period due to technology
> >     change over bring in new functionality.
>
> OTOH, Verizon is not the only provider of smartphone connectivity in the
> world. Most of them try to be "good citizens" and do not waste a scarce
> resource (IPv4 space).

I disagree that using global IPv4 space is a "waste".  Every device 
deserves to have "real" internet connectivity and not this NAT crap.