nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:25:06 +0000
On 29/12/2009 21:10, Joe Greco wrote:
How do you offer a "cheaper" level of (let's say) Web-only Internet access, when the support costs will be higher? Where's the value? What's the business plan? Where's the profit in that?
As an unrelated footnote, these are questions which will become highly relevant when RIR address space depletion occurs and when providers initially believe that they can create viable product sets based on provider NAT, once their v4 address space can no longer service their customer base. [As a further sub-note, the "believe" bit is not a statement of scepticism, but rather a statement of fact; many providers will almost certainly believe that end-users will swallow provider NAT, regardless of whether the product models turn out to be viable or not.] So, although it's a different context, I think you'll see the answer to these questions in this context in the next couple of years. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic, (continued)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dan White (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Alexander Harrowell (Dec 30)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Nick Hilliard (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic TJ (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Andy Davidson (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Provo (Dec 30)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Tomas L. Byrnes (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic David Conrad (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Michael Thomas (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)