nanog mailing list archives
Re: ip-precedence for management traffic
From: tvest () eyeconomics com
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:41:33 -0500
On Dec 29, 2009, at 5:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
None of us knows precisely what we're going to absolutely require, or merely want/prefer, tomorrow or the next day, much less a year or twofrom now. Unless, of course, we choose to optimize (constrain) functionality so tightly around what we want/need today that the prospect of getting anything different is effectively eliminated.this is the telco solution to the nasty disruptive technologies spawnedby the internetI could be mistaken, but I think Tom's point was "we could give peoplethe ebony black bell phone, that'd really suck for us as a business/community."sorry, i should have been more clear that i was agreeing with tom. replies might not be assumed to be in opposition.
I got that ;-) Chris is right, but so is Randy.IMO if the net is ultimately diminished in this manner, either through commission or omission, eating anything other than our own dog food would be neither defensible, nor sustainable for long.
The rotary phone was great in its time, but that time has passed -- today there's lot more at stake than handset color.
TV
Current thread:
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic, (continued)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Dan White (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic tvest (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Alexander Harrowell (Dec 30)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Nick Hilliard (Dec 29)
- RE: ip-precedence for management traffic TJ (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Greco (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Jared Mauch (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Andy Davidson (Dec 29)
- Re: ip-precedence for management traffic Joe Provo (Dec 30)