nanog mailing list archives
Re: Official Mail, was SPF Configurations
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 7 Dec 2009 22:26:27 -0000
I would love to know how the marketplace wants to handle "Official Mail," but I'm not expecting useful answers here.
The marketplace doesn't have a clue. We have a plenty of tools in the toolbox, from heavyweight S/MIME to lighter weight DKIM+VBR to proprietary Goodmail, but among the mailers with a stake in having a reliable spoof-resistant channel I don't see much interest in doing anything other than whatever they're doing now. If it were up to me, I'd use per-recipient password-protected RSS or Atom feeds with emailed notices that just say to check your feed, but that has patent issues. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: SPF Configurations, (continued)
- Re: SPF Configurations Bret Clark (Dec 04)
- Re: SPF Configurations James Bensley (Dec 04)
- Re: SPF Configurations John Levine (Dec 04)
- AW: SPF Configurations Andre Engel (Dec 04)
- Re: AW: SPF Configurations John R. Levine (Dec 04)
- AW: AW: SPF Configurations Andre Engel (Dec 05)
- Re: SPF Configurations Bret Clark (Dec 04)
- Re: SPF Configurations Lars Eggert (Dec 04)
- Re: SPF Configurations Sean Donelan (Dec 06)
- Re: SPF Configurations Bill Stewart (Dec 06)
- Re: SPF Configurations Sean Donelan (Dec 07)
- Re: Official Mail, was SPF Configurations John Levine (Dec 07)
- Re: SPF Configurations Michael Holstein (Dec 07)
- Re: SPF Configurations Douglas Otis (Dec 07)
- Re: SPF Configurations Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 07)
- Re: SPF Configurations Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- Re: SPF Configurations Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 08)
- Re: SPF Configurations Michael Holstein (Dec 08)
- Re: SPF Configurations Tony Finch (Dec 08)
- RE: SPF Configurations Jeffrey Negro (Dec 04)