RE: amazonaws.com?

[Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>]

On Wed, 28 May 2008, michael.dillon () bt com wrote:
> > I don't see how, in your preferred replacement email
> > architecture, a provider would be able to avoid policing
> > their users to prevent spam in the way that you complain is
> > so burdensome.
>
> To begin with, mail could only enter such a system through
> port 587 or through a rogue operator signing an email peering
> agreement. In either case, there is a bilateral contract involved
> so that it is clear whose customer is doing wrong, and therefore
> who is responsible for policing it.

This is different from Amazon's situation how?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTHEAST ICELAND: EASTERLY 4 OR 5, INCREASING 6 OR 7. MODERATE INCREASING
ROUGH. RAIN LATER. MODERATE OR GOOD, OCCASIONALLY POOR.