nanog mailing list archives
Re: amazonaws.com?
From: Colin Alston <karnaugh () karnaugh za net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 21:08:13 +0200
On 27/05/2008 20:53 Robert Bonomi wrote:
Because the _privilege_ to send packets to other networks has been, from 'day one', conditional on the presumption that the sending network _is_ a "good neighbor" to the networks receiving their traffic.
You need to wake up Dorothy, this isn't Kansas anymore. Free access to the internet won long ago, it's all about defending your self.
-- Colin Alston ~ http://syllogism.co.za/"To the world you may be one person, to one person you may be the world" ~ Rachel Ann Nunes.
Current thread:
- Re: amazonaws.com?, (continued)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Robert Bonomi (May 26)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Robert Bonomi (May 27)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 27)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Ian Mason (May 29)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Paul Vixie (May 29)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 30)
- RE: amazonaws.com? Robert Bonomi (May 27)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Colin Alston (May 27)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 27)
- RE: amazonaws.com? Tony Finch (May 28)
- RE: amazonaws.com? michael.dillon (May 28)
- RE: amazonaws.com? Tony Finch (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Sargun Dhillon (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Steve Atkins (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Sargun Dhillon (May 28)
- RE: amazonaws.com? Skywing (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Dorn Hetzel (May 28)
- Re: amazonaws.com? Peter Beckman (May 28)