RE: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network

["Jason J. W. Williams" <williamsjj () digitar com>]

I'm subscribed to both now. ;-) The advantage to the NANOG subject
header was obviously it was resilient to e-mail address changes for the
list. A nice attribute given e-mails now come in from both
nanog () nanog org and nanog () merit edu addresses. Anyhow, I assume there
was compelling reason for the change.

-J

---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com

E: williamsjj () digitar com
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: williamsjj () digitar com

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Stickland [mailto:sam_mailinglists () spacething org] 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Joe Abley
Cc: nanog; nanog-futures
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network

Joe Abley wrote:
> On 22 May 2008, at 23:16, James R. Cutler wrote:
>
> > The announcement was made to nanog-announce, but not to nanog. I 
> > would expect that there are scads more readers of nanog than of nanog

> > announce.
>
> When I was sending things to nanog-announce, it was the case that mail

> to nanog-announce was sent to people who had specifically subscribed 
> to that list, plus anybody who hadn't but who was subscribed to nanog 
> (in other words, it was sent to the union of both lists).
>
> That might have changed since the transition to mailman. It seemed 
> like a useful approach, though.
Kinda makes you wonder what the purpose on the announce list is though. 
Are there actually people subscribed to nanog-annouce that aren't 
subscribed to nanog?

Sam

!SIG:4836ce2871591551116042!