nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 05:44:36 -0400
Once upon a time, wasn't nanog@ subscribed to nanog-announce@ ? It appears to not be now. I went looking in my archives for that message-id; the only copy of that mail I got was from you, and I am on both -futures and the main list. Thanks for sending that along, Jim. ---Rob "Jim Popovitch" <yahoo () jimpop com> writes:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, someone wrote:Add me to the list of never-saw-that. In addition, I just checked the nanog archives, and there isn't an announcement of that type in the archives.Below is the full email, with headers, from Monday. Hopefully it will put this issue to rest.... but somehow I doubt that. ;-) -Jim P. Received: by 10.90.53.15 with SMTP id b15cs245753aga; Mon, 19 May 2008 16:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.10.13 with SMTP id n13mr12798008pyi.30.1211238167720; Mon, 19 May 2008 16:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org> Received: from s0.nanog.org (s0.nanog.org [198.108.95.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s59si4779396pyh.13.2008.05.19.16.02.47; Mon, 19 May 2008 16:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org designates 198.108.95.20 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.108.95.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org designates 198.108.95.20 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=s0.nanog.org) by s0.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org>) id 1JyENK-0006V5-UV; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:02:38 +0000 Received: from ind-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.104.129.195]) by s0.nanog.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <pfs () cisco com>) id 1JyENI-0006UC-1L for nanog-announce () nanog org; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:02:36 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,512,1204482600"; d="scan'208";a="107943185" Received: from hkg-dkim-1.cisco.com ([10.75.231.161]) by ind-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 May 2008 04:32:33 +0530 Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com (hkg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.123.94]) by hkg-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4JN2XlM012133 for <nanog-announce () nanog org>; Tue, 20 May 2008 07:02:33 +0800 Received: from Philip-PB.local (sin-vpn-client-20-47.cisco.com [10.68.20.47]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4JN2WVp007247 for <nanog-announce () nanog org>; Mon, 19 May 2008 23:02:32 GMT Message-ID: <48320722.70807 () cisco com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 09:02:58 +1000 From: Philip Smith <pfs () cisco com> Organization: Cisco Systems User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nanog-announce () nanog org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Authentication-Results: hkg-dkim-1; header.From=pfs () cisco com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/hkgdkim1002 verified; ); Subject: [NANOG-announce] email subject tags and footers X-BeenThere: nanog-announce () nanog org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: NANOG-Announce <nanog-announce.nanog.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce>, <mailto:nanog-announce-request () nanog org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-announce> List-Post: <mailto:nanog-announce () nanog org> List-Help: <mailto:nanog-announce-request () nanog org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce>, <mailto:nanog-announce-request () nanog org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: nanog-announce-bounces () nanog org Hi everyone, Following the discussion on nanog-futures, we'd like to let you all know that the [NANOG] in the subject line and the three extra info lines mailman appends will be dropped from all future messages going to the NANOG list, starting in around 24 hours from now. If any of you have you changed your <nanog () nanog org> e-mail filtering to depend on the [NANOG] subject tag, please consider this 24 hours notice to move to another message filtering technique. Best wishes, philip (for the SC) -- _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures () nanog org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
Current thread:
- RE: Hughes Network, (continued)
- RE: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 22)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 22)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network James R. Cutler (May 22)
- nanog / nanog-announce subs (was Re: Announce list: Re: Hughes Network) Philip Smith (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Sam Stickland (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Marshall Eubanks (May 23)
- RE: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Robert E. Seastrom (May 23)
- RE: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Security Admin (NetSec) (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Owen DeLong (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 22)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? david raistrick (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Seth Mattinen (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Sean Figgins (May 21)