nanog mailing list archives
Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys?
From: david raistrick <drais () icantclick org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:27:43 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Tony Varriale wrote:
AFAIK, ARIN doesn't give out /22s anymore.
It's a recent change in the past couple of years. Still current:"However, for multi-homed organizations, the minimum allocation size is a /22"
http://www.arin.net/registration/guidelines/ipv4_initial_alloc.htmlNow, if you're not multihomed you still have the /20 as the longest prefix.
--- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais () icantclick org http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Current thread:
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network, (continued)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Sam Stickland (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Marshall Eubanks (May 23)
- RE: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jason J. W. Williams (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Jim Popovitch (May 23)
- Re: [Nanog-futures] Announce list: Re: Hughes Network Robert E. Seastrom (May 23)
- RE: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Security Admin (NetSec) (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Owen DeLong (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Joe Warren-Meeks (May 22)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? david raistrick (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Seth Mattinen (May 21)
- Re: [NANOG] Multihoming for small frys? Sean Figgins (May 21)