nanog mailing list archives
RE: Customer-facing ACLs
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:21:21 -0800
--- Jason.Carpenter () citadelgroup com wrote: That's the problem isn't it? Who decides what can and cant go through. I think the tier approach is better, a basic user account where everything is blocked and a Sysadmin type account where everything is open. If the price is different enough then only people who are going to use those extra ports will actually pay for it. ---------------------------------------------------- We need to take this off-line. All long timers are groaning, rolling their eyes and putting this in their kill file. Try convincing your product managers to create a new product just to appease 'sysadmin types'. scott
Current thread:
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs, (continued)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 08)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Chris Marlatt (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Sean Donelan (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Andy Davidson (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Marshall Eubanks (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Jon Lewis (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 18)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Justin Shore (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Adrian Chadd (Mar 07)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Sean Donelan (Mar 10)
- RE: Customer-facing ACLs Frank Bulk - iNAME (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Sean Donelan (Mar 10)
- Re: Customer-facing ACLs Andy Dills (Mar 10)