Re: Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt

["Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>]

Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net> writes:

> > Perhaps you could integrate your work with a project like pfsense?
> >
> > From what I've seen, that's the best "open source CPE" solution, and
> > doesn't yet have real IPv6 support (but has just about everything
> > else).
> > That would be a huge benefit to the community and potentially open
> > up some
> > business opportunities for you.
>
>
> It'd be good if the pfsense guys would do some IPv6 stuff, yes. I
> however, am not really interested in building CPEs, nor am I
> interested in building CPEs commercially.

My understanding is that there is some IPv6 support in HEAD, but not
in RELENG_1.  Someone who has the time and inclination should join the
development team; they do not seem averse to the notion of having v6
support in there, but like so many other endeavors, effort is
commensurate with demand, yadda yadda yadda...

                                        ---rob