Re: Transition Planning for IPv6 as mandated by the US Govt

["Larry J. Blunk" <ljb () merit edu>]

Randy Bush wrote:
> > I believe whoever shows off a functional NAT-PT device at the next NANOG
> > might get some praise. I heard it was a bit of a disaster.
> >     
>
> by the time the show got to apnic/apricot the week after nanog, we had
> the cisco implementation of nat-pt and totd working and it worked well.
>
> randy
>   
  And the NAT-PT implementation at NANOG (naptd) did seem
to work once some configuration issues were ironed out.   Unfortunately,
this was not resolved until the very end of the meeting.