nanog mailing list archives
Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
From: David Coulson <david () davidcoulson net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:50:27 -0400
Ian Henderson wrote:
I had a weird Cisco problem on 12.2S where it would refuse to establish a BGP peering to a loopback with a .0 IP address. I moved it to something else and it worked fine. I gave up trying to figure it out.- Using a .255 loopback on a Cisco 6500 SNMP requests would return from the closest interface IP address. Combined with a specific version of SNMP libraries (which I can't recall right now), this caused queries to fail
David
Current thread:
- .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Hubbard (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Christopher Morrow (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Andersen (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Peter Dambier (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Kameron Gasso (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Mark Smith (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Tim Durack (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Christopher Morrow (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Coulson (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Mike Lewinski (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? William Allen Simpson (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Jared (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Greg VILLAIN (Jun 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Scott Weeks (Jun 14)