nanog mailing list archives
Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years?
From: Kameron Gasso <kgasso-lists () visp net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:43:36 -0700
Christopher Morrow wrote:
go-go-actiontec (vol sends those out, god do they suck...)
Crappy CPE's are exactly why we don't hand out .0 and .255 addresses in our DHCP pools. :(
-- Kameron Gasso | Senior Systems Administrator | visp.net Direct: 541-955-6903 | Fax: 541-471-0821
Current thread:
- .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Hubbard (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Christopher Morrow (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Andersen (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Peter Dambier (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Kameron Gasso (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Mark Smith (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Tim Durack (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Christopher Morrow (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? David Coulson (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Mike Lewinski (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? William Allen Simpson (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Jared (Jun 13)
- Re: .255 addresses still not usable after all these years? Greg VILLAIN (Jun 14)