Re: Software router state of the art

[Justin Sharp <sharp () sharpone net>]

michael.dillon () bt com wrote:
> > but knowing how bad Linux is at being a router and that their 
> > products are Linux-based, I'm afraid to give one a try. J 
> > products are based on a competing non-Linux platform that has 
> > a better reputation for routing.
> >     
>
> Enough with the bipartisan politics. There are more choices than 
> just Linux and FreeBSD for software routing.
>
> Click for instance <http://read.cs.ucla.edu/click/>
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
>   
Anyone have experience with RouterOS (http://www.mikrotik.com/)? Created 
mostly to run on these guys I think 
(http://www.routerboard.com/comparison.html) which generally don't get 
above 200k pps on the higher models.. But will RouterOS run on bigger boxen?