nanog mailing list archives
Re: Software router state of the art
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:55:17 -0700
Sargun Dhillon wrote:
This is not exactly true. The modern Linux kernel (2.6) uses some amount of flow tracking in order to do route caching. You can check this out on your system by:"ip route show cache"
Did you mean "route -C" ?I like the idea and price point of the ImageStream products, but knowing how bad Linux is at being a router and that their products are Linux-based, I'm afraid to give one a try. J products are based on a competing non-Linux platform that has a better reputation for routing.
~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: Software router state of the art, (continued)
- Re: Software router state of the art Adrian Chadd (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Dorn Hetzel (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art William Herrin (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Florian Weimer (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Tony Finch (Jul 27)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 26)
- Re: Software router state of the art Sargun Dhillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Eugeniu Patrascu (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- RE: Software router state of the art michael.dillon (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Justin Sharp (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Andrew D Kirch (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art David E. Smith (Jul 29)
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Charles Wyble (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Joe Greco (Jul 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Software router state of the art Seth Mattinen (Jul 28)
- Re: Software router state of the art Deepak Jain (Jul 28)