nanog mailing list archives
RE: Level 3 issues
From: Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch () cpgreeley com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:17:40 -0700
I have heard this story several times. The train derailment was yesterday in New York unless it has not made it to news.google.com on a search for train derail. Issues did not start until 1030 MST. It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major network issues today. -----Original Message----- From: Alex H. Ryu [mailto:r.hyunseog () ieee org] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 2:44 PM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Derek Bodner; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues It seems that there was fiber cut because of train derailment around NY area. Alex Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Any word on the actual cause of the issue? From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedlists () derekbodner com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Looks like most providers here in the east coast are routing through level3 again, and I'm not seeing any packet loss or latency anymore. On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch () cpgreeley com<mailto:bpfankuch () cpgreeley com>> wrote: Seems to be normalizing here in Colorado as well, however still having occasional packet loss to NY. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon () defenderhosting com<mailto:jon () defenderhosting com>] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM To: Jason Cheslock Cc: nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Confirmed here as well. Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Cheslock" <sangreviento () gmail com<mailto:sangreviento () gmail com>> To: "marco" <marco () zero11 com<mailto:marco () zero11 com>> Cc: nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:35:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: Level 3 issues According to L3, this issue should be fixed and we should start seeingthe traffic normalizing. Can anyone confirm?Here in Richmond Virginia, everything seems to be back to normal now. Traffic coming from my Comcast connection can get through L3 now. 7 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net<http://te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net> [68. 86.91.121] 8 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.79.231 .9] 9 12 ms 17 ms 18 ms vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.68.17.190] 10 12 ms 17 ms 17 ms ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.1 85] 11 16 ms 26 ms 16 ms ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.132.94] 12 32 ms 30 ms 17 ms ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.74] 13 15 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.68.16.142] -- Derek Bodner subscribedlists () derekbodner com<mailto:subscribedlists () derekbodner com>
Current thread:
- RE: Level 3 issues, (continued)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Kevin Loch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Steven King (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues virendra rode (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Rich Kulawiec (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Alex H. Ryu (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jim Popovitch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Justin M. Streiner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Todd Vierling (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 29)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- unsubscribe Springer, Dennis D (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe James Thomas (Dec 29)
- RE: unsubscribe Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)