nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 issues
From: marco <marco () zero11 com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:11:13 -0800
Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Any word on the actual cause of the issue? From: Derek Bodner [mailto:subscribedlists () derekbodner com] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:53 AM To: Blake Pfankuch Cc: Jon Wolberg; Jason Cheslock; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Looks like most providers here in the east coast are routing through level3 again, and I'm not seeing any packet loss or latency anymore. On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch <bpfankuch () cpgreeley com<mailto:bpfankuch () cpgreeley com>> wrote: Seems to be normalizing here in Colorado as well, however still having occasional packet loss to NY. -----Original Message----- From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon () defenderhosting com<mailto:jon () defenderhosting com>] Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:40 AM To: Jason Cheslock Cc: nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Level 3 issues Confirmed here as well. Jon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Cheslock" <sangreviento () gmail com<mailto:sangreviento () gmail com>> To: "marco" <marco () zero11 com<mailto:marco () zero11 com>> Cc: nanog () nanog org<mailto:nanog () nanog org> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 1:35:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: Level 3 issues According to L3, this issue should be fixed and we should start seeingthe traffic normalizing. Can anyone confirm?Here in Richmond Virginia, everything seems to be back to normal now. Traffic coming from my Comcast connection can get through L3 now. 7 11 ms 13 ms 11 ms te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net<http://te-0-3-0-0-cr01.mclean.va.ibone.comcast.net> [68. 86.91.121] 8 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net<http://xe-11-1-0.edge1.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.79.231 .9] 9 12 ms 17 ms 18 ms vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net<http://vlan89.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.68.17.190] 10 12 ms 17 ms 17 ms ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net<http://ae-84-84.ebr4.Washington1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.1 85] 11 16 ms 26 ms 16 ms ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-3.ebr1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.132.94] 12 32 ms 30 ms 17 ms ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-81-81.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.69.134.74] 13 15 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net<http://ae-3-89.edge1.NewYork1.Level3.net> [4.68.16.142] -- Derek Bodner subscribedlists () derekbodner com<mailto:subscribedlists () derekbodner com> From what I heard, it was some some malfunction with a router in
Washington D.C. which terminated a 100GB bundle from Paris. It was carring about 50GB at the time of the failure. Not sure why routes within the US would be effected.
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 issues, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Pierre-Henri (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Paul Stewart (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Paul (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jason Cheslock (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jon Wolberg (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Derek Bodner (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Kevin Loch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Steven King (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues marco (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Murphy, Jay, DOH (Dec 29)
- RE: Level 3 issues Paul Stewart (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Matthew Petach (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues virendra rode (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Rich Kulawiec (Dec 29)
- Re: Level 3 issues Alex H. Ryu (Dec 28)
- RE: Level 3 issues Blake Pfankuch (Dec 28)
- Re: Level 3 issues Jim Popovitch (Dec 28)