nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:23:25 -0500
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:37:41 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" <oberman () es net> wrote:
The main reason I prefer ISIS is that it uses CLNS packets for communications and we don't route CLNS. (I don't think ANYONE is routing CLNS today.) That makes it pretty secure.
Unless, of course, someone one hop away -- a peer? a customer? an upstream or downstream? someone on the same LAN at certain exchange points? -- sends you a CLNP packet at link level... --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3, (continued)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Randy Bush (Dec 28)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Roque Gagliano (Dec 30)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Joe Malcolm (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Kevin Oberman (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Martin List-Petersen (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 27)