nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 23:55:27 +0800
On Saturday 27 December 2008 09:08:50 pm Martin List- Petersen wrote:
Only if the vendors pick up on those changes.
Juniper support this since JunOS 9.2 (draft-ietf-ospf-af- alt-06.txt). Cheers, Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3, (continued)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 28)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Roque Gagliano (Dec 30)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 30)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Steven M. Bellovin (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Joe Malcolm (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Kevin Oberman (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Martin List-Petersen (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 Mark Tinka (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- RE: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 TJ (Dec 27)
- Re: IPv6: IS-IS or OSPFv3 devang patel (Dec 27)