nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:32:05 -0400
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:48:33 -0000, bmanning () vacation karoshi com said:
true enough. i guess this means that we get IPv6 "as is, where is" and there will be limited new development of same.
I can't conceive of any possible solution to IPv6 mobility, multihoming, routing, <insert deficiency here> which would find the mere fact that the WG is closed a problem, given that a decade of the WG being *open* didn't produce deployable results.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6), (continued)
- Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Alain Durand (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jeroen Massar (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Eliot Lear (Sep 28)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Mark Prior (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) John Curran (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Mark Prior (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) John Curran (Sep 30)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)