nanog mailing list archives
Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:05:05 +0200
On 26-sep-2007, at 18:24, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
You make this sound negative.
I was more amused by the Subject: line -- that IP Version 6 has concluded, rather than the working group... I agree that closing old groups will often -- though not always -- result in focusing on the newer and more important issues, rather than spending time polishing the chrome on the old issues.
Maybe the IETF should "conclude BGP version 4"? Iljitsch PS. :-)
Current thread:
- Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 25)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 26)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Jari Arkko (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Fred Baker (Sep 26)
- Re: Fw: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 27)
- Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6) Randy Bush (Sep 27)