nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question on Loosely Synchronized Router Clocks


From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:18:15 -0400

Kerberos does not assume clock synchronization.
Kerberos requires reasonable clock synchronization.
And, as near as I can tell, clock synchronization is not part of the Kerberos protocol.

Kick me if I err in this.

        Cutler

At 9/19/2007 08:14 AM -0400, Jeff McAdams wrote:
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>> ... is it reasonable to assume clock synchronization in the rest
>> of our design?

> In general, it is not.  I can't think of any existing protocol that
> does, actually.

Kerberos.
--
Jeff McAdams
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                       -- Benjamin Franklin




-
James R. Cutler
james.cutler () consultant com

Current thread: