Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos

[Stephen Stuart <stuart () tech org>]

> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Sean Donelan wrote:
> > Operators are probably more interested in the "fairness" part of
> > "congestion" than the "efficiency" part of "congestion."
>
> TCP's idea of fairness is a bit weird. Shouldn't it be per-user, not
> per-flow?

How would you define "user" in that context?

Stephen