nanog mailing list archives
Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos
From: John Curran <jcurran () mail com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 21:37:46 -0400
At 9:21 PM -0400 9/3/07, Joe Abley wrote:
Is there a groundswell of *operators* who think TCP should be replaced, and believe it can be replaced?
Just imagine *that* switchover, with the same level of transition planning as we received with IPv6... ;-) /John
Current thread:
- Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos nanditad (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Joe Abley (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos John Curran (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Joel Jaeggli (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos John Curran (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos bmanning (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Mark Smith (Sep 05)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos John Curran (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Joe Abley (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Sean Donelan (Sep 03)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Stephen Stuart (Sep 04)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call for Demos Tony Finch (Sep 04)
- Re: Congestion control train-wreck workshop at Stanford: Call forDemos Christian Kuhtz (Sep 04)