nanog mailing list archives
Re: 240/4
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:33:40 -0400
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:20:54 PDT, David Ulevitch said:
The effort someone would spend figuring out if 204/4 is reachable and not-pain-inducing in their infrastructure is better spent figuring out how to make IPv6 work within their sphere of responsibilities.
After the pain felt by 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, and others, you'd think it would almost be enough to make a provider say "screw it" and go IPv6-only. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: 240/4, (continued)