nanog mailing list archives
Re: 240/4
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:27:05 +0300 (EEST)
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Thus spake "Pekka Savola" <pekkas () netcore fi>The operators who want to do something private with this space don't need the IETF or IANA approval to do so. So they should just go ahead and do it. If they can manage to get it to work, and live to tell about it, maybe we can consider that sufficient proof that we can start thinking about reclassification.There are, fortunately, a number of vendors that don't like to go against existing RFCs.
So.. can you clarify. Which RFCs require routers or hosts to reject 240/4?
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Current thread:
- Re: 240/4, (continued)
- Re: 240/4 Pekka Savola (Oct 16)
- Re: 240/4 Stephen Sprunk (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Pekka Savola (Oct 18)
- Re: 240/4 Florian Weimer (Oct 16)