nanog mailing list archives

Re: 240/4


From: Alain Durand <alain_durand () cable comcast com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:08:25 -0600





On 10/16/07 11:56 AM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:

Classifying it as private use should come with the health warning "use this
at your own risk, this stuff can blow up your network". In other words, this
is for experimental use only.

disagree.  as you point out, this is analogous to deploying ipv6; i do
not think you would want us to put an "experimental" warning on that. if
you certify your kit to handle it, then it will work in production.

I'm trying to avoid setting the expectation that 240/4 is just a simple
extension to 10/8 and thus people should use it *today* when they run out of
space in RFC1918. Thus the health warning.

  - Alain.


Current thread: