nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: "Jason Frisvold" <xenophage0 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 14:03:02 -0400
On 5/10/07, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
If you're not offering VoIP services, your life may be easier as you will only need to intercept the data. Depending on your environment you could do this with something like port-mirroring, or something more advanced. There are a number of folks that offer TTP (Trusted third-provider) services. Verisign comes to mind. But using a TTP doesn't mean you can hide behind them. Compliance is ultimately your (the company that gets the subponea) responsibility.
Here's a question that's come up around here. Does a CALEA intercept include "hairpining" or is it *only* traffic leaving your network? I'm of the opinion that a CALEA intercept request includes every bit of traffic being sent or received by the targeted individual, but there is strong opposition here that thinks only internet-related traffic counts.
- Jared (IANAL!)
-- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0 () gmail com http://blog.godshell.com
Current thread:
- ISP CALEA compliance Nikos Mouat (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David E. Smith (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jeff Shultz (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Daniel Senie (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Patrick Muldoon (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jason Frisvold (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 10)