nanog mailing list archives
Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 13 May 2007 00:44:34 -0000
At least to file the obvious crap into a different folder that can be looked at and blown awayDifficult, as spam complaints generally include the original spam and thus trigger SpamAssassin (almost) just as hard.
A complaint with copy of the original spam has headers in the body of the message, which most spam doesn't. It's not perfect, but considering what a simple test that is, it works pretty well as part of a first cut. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?, (continued)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? John Levine (May 11)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? william(at)elan.net (May 11)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? K K (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Douglas Otis (May 13)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? John Levine (May 13)
- RE: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Stasiniewicz, Adam (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Al Iverson (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Gerry Boudreaux (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Niels Bakker (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? John Levine (May 12)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Al Iverson (May 13)
- Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling? Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 13)