nanog mailing list archives
Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:08:59 -0500
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:22:37 +0000 (GMT) "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Jon Lewis wrote:On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Eric Ortega wrote:I'd like to thank the group for the responses and help with this issue. I find it ironic that Randy's study actually uses 96 space.The amazing/sad thing is that people have been facing and fixing the same problem for more than 4 years. How many times does a network have to fix their static bogon filters before coming to the realization that those filters are a bad idea?So, where are static bogon filters appropriate? (loaded question perhaps) I ask because just about every 'security expert' and 'security whitepaper' or 'security suggestions' has some portion that speaks to "why it's a grand idea to have acl-lines/firewall-policy tp block 'bogon' ip space" (for some definition of 'bogon' of course).
Well, not all of us advocate that; see http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2006-01/msg00150.html --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Current thread:
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons, (continued)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Sean Donelan (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Adrian Chadd (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 02)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 02)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Rob Thomas (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 04)