nanog mailing list archives
Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:40:16 -0800
On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
So... again, are bogon filters 'in the core' useful? (call 'core' some network not yours)
Antispoofing is 'static' and therefore brittle in nature, people change jobs, etc. - so, we shouldn't do antispoofing, either?
Enterprises typically don't do this stuff. They should, and we work to educate them, but it's even more difficult in that space than in the SP space.
A question I have is whether or not this class of problems is more of a 'need the vendors to come up with better/easier functionality' type of problem, a 'need the SPs to do a better job with this' kind of problem, or is it more in the realm of a 'TCP/IP in its current incarnation(s) lends itself these kinds of issues' type of problem?
----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice The telephone demands complete participation. -- Marshall McLuhan
Current thread:
- Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons, (continued)
- Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Gregory Edigarov (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Peter Thoenen (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Joseph S D Yao (Mar 03)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Jon Lewis (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Sean Donelan (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Adrian Chadd (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 02)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 02)
- Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Rob Thomas (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Chris L. Morrow (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Roland Dobbins (Mar 01)
- Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)